HORMONES 2008, 7(2):133-139
DOI: 
Review
Growth hormone treatment in human ageing: benefits and risks
Roberta Giordano, Lorenza Bonelli, Elisa Marinazzo, Ezio Ghigo, Emanuela Arvat

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Abstract

This paper will focus on the rationale of using Growth Hormone (GH) as an anti-ageing therapy in the healthy elderly with age-related decline in the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis, the so called “somatopause”. Although the age-related decline in the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis is considered to contribute to age-related changes similar to those observed in Growth Hormone Deficient (GHD) adults, GH/IGF-I deficiency or resistance is also known to result in prolonged life expectancy, at least in animals. These data raise the question whether or not GH deficiency constitutes a beneficial adaptation to ageing and therefore requires no therapy. Moreover, although GH therapy has been shown to exert positive effects in GHD patients, its safety, efficacy and role in healthy elderly individuals is highly controversial. This review provides a comprehensive account of the implications of GH therapy in the ageing subject.

Keywords

Ageing, GHRH, GHS, IGF-I, rhGH


Read PDF

INTRODUCTION

The age-related decline in the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis represents the most impressive example of decreased activity in the neural control of somatotroph cells as an expression of age-related changes.1-4 Both in animals and in humans, Growth Hormone (GH) secretion undergoes clear age-related variations that are generally mirrored by IGF-I levels, the best marker of GH status, a notable exception being the neonatal period.1-4 Spontaneous pulsatile GH secretion is high in newborns, decreases in childhood and maintains constant levels up to the onset of puberty;5,6 later in life, a further progressive fall in 24 h GH secretory rates occurs with advancing age.3,7,8 IGF-I levels are low at birth despite GH hypersecretion, then, from childhood to ageing, at least in well nourished subjects, IGF-I levels generally reflect the GH status, showing an increase at puberty and progressive decline from puberty to ageing;3,4 in fact, in elderly subjects, IGF-I levels often overlap with those recorded in adult patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD).3,4,9

Although mechanisms underlying the age-related variations of GH release include peripheral influences (i.e. gonadal steroids, adiposity), changes in hypothalamic neuropeptides and neurotransmitters leading to decreased Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (GHRH) secretion, as well as absolute or relative somatostatin (SS) hypersecretion seem to be of primary importance.1-5 Additionally, age-related variations in ghrelin —a gastric hormone identified as a natural GH Secretagogue (GHS)- could play a role in the decreased GH secretion associated with ageing.10-12

It is well known that ageing is associated with changes in body composition, metabolism and structure functions1-4 similar to those observed in adults with GHD.9,13 These observations, together with the demonstration of an age-related decline in the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis, have led to the introduction of the neologism “somatopause”: it indicates the potential link between the age-related decline in GH and IGF-I levels and frailty in ageing. It was thus hypothesized that, by restoring GH and IGF-I levels to those encountered in young people, it would be possible to counteract the age-related changes in body composition and metabolism, as it has been observed in young GHD patients receiving rhGH replacement therapy.9,14

Moreover, GH and IGF-I also exert remarkable effects on the central nervous system (CNS), mainly on brain plasticity and functions; changes in GH/IGF-I activity have been shown to be associated with cognitive and sleep disorders.15-20 It was therefore hypothesized that restoration of GH and/or IGF-I levels would positively affect CNS functions frequently impaired in aged people.

This paper is focused on the controversies surrounding the use of recombinant human Growth Hormone (rhGH) and/or GH-releasing molecules aiming at “rejuvenating” the GH/IGF-I axis in the elderly, taking concurrently into account the evidence that deficiency in the GH/IGF-I axis has been associated with prolonged life, at least in animals.

EFFECTS OF rhGH THERAPY IN THE ELDERLY (Table 1 )

The strong clinical similarity between adult GHD and normal ageing, together with the evidence that patients with severe GHD benefit from rhGH replacement and that elderly subjects present decreased activity of the GH/IGF-I axis, have raised the question as to whether or not aged people could benefit by a restoration of the GH and IGF-I levels to those encountered in young people. Several clinical trials focusing on the effects of rhGH replacement therapy were initiated aiming at “rejuvenating” the GH/IGF-I axis and thus acting as an anabolic anti-ageing agent.

The pioneering work of Rudman and colleagues14 provided the first evidence that GH treatment (30 μg/kg three times weekly for six months) in the elderly could reverse some of the changes which characterize somatopause, as for example improvement in body composition and Bone Mineral Density (BMD). In the subsequent years, further studies in aged subjects without pituitary disease have been performed, yielding controversial results.21

Basically, GH treatment was found to improve some parameters of body composition in healthy elderly, including an increase in lean body and muscle mass and a reduction of total body fat.14,21,22-25 It must be noted, however, that some of the increase in lean body mass could be due to fluid retention, since methods evaluating lean body mass barely differentiate lean solid tissue from fluid mass.9 Although GH treatment decreased total cholesterol levels, no significant effects on LDL, HDL cholesterol or triglycerides were reported.21,22 No positive effects on other clinically important outcomes, such as muscle strength, bone mass, functional capacity and glucose metabolism, have ever been clearly demonstrated by such intervention.14,21,23,26

In the few studies designed to evaluate the independent effects of GH treatment and lifestyle interventions (e.g. exercise program and resistance training), no significant differences were found in body composition outcomes between subjects treated with GH plus lifestyle intervention and those treated with GH alone.21,26,27 Furthermore, these studies could not demonstrate any additional effects of GH on strength training in terms of increased muscle strength, resistance or physical performance.21,26,27

It has been suggested, however, that the increase of GH/IGF-I activity might have a positive influence on ageing “frailty”. In fact, some studies have demonstrated that pharmacological doses of GH were able to counteract the negative effects of acute diseases or surgery, allowing earlier return to independent life.28 Moreover, another, potentially valuable, setting for the use of GH treatment is in elderly patients undergoing hemodialysis, where GH was able to improve important variables, such as serum albumin, total body fat-free mass and cross-sectional calf muscle area.29

Besides the effects on body composition and metabolism, GH and IGF-I have recently been shown to exert actions on the central nervous system (CNS), improving sleep, cognitive functions and neuronal cell survival,15-20 in agreement with evidence that GH and IGF-I receptors are expressed in many brain areas.20,30 Both GH and IGF-I play a role in the development and differentiation of CNS, by exerting neurotrophic, neuroprotective and metabolic effects.20,31 These actions represent the rational basis for considering the potential usefulness of increasing GH/IGF-I levels in the ageing brain as well as in neurodegenerative disorders.

A link between the decline in somatotroph activity and cognitive function during normal ageing has not yet been proven and thus remains controversial. Some studies reported a positive correlation between total IGF-I levels or IGF/IGFBP3 ratio and cognitive function in elderly individuals,32,33 but these results have not been confirmed by other studies.34-36 Interestingly, IGF-1 but not GH levels correlate with cognitive parameters in elderly subjects.17 Hence, at present there is no clear evidence that treatment with rhGH or rhIGF-I significantly improves cognitive parameters, memory or mood in normal elderly subjects.21,37,38 These results are in contrast to those in young adult GHD patients, in whom a positive effect of GH replacement therapy on cognitive function and well-being have been reported.9,38

SIDE EFFECTS AND RISKS OF rhGH REPLACEMENT IN THE ELDERLY

The theoretical side effects of GH therapy in the elderly are similar to those in young GHD adults. However, concerns have been voiced about the use of GH in the elderly for many reasons. Quite early it was shown that GH administration in healthy elderly individuals very frequently caused acute adverse effects, such as fluid retention, carpal tunnel syndrome and gynecomastia.14,21 They were generally dose-dependent, probably reflecting over-dosage and/or wide inter-individual variations in GH sensitivity.14,21,38 Soft tissue edema was a particularly common adverse event in women treated with rhGH and, notably, it was not related to the dose used.21 Fluid retention appears to be due to GH action on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, as demonstrated by the evidence that ACE inhibitors, as well as spironolactone, abolish the GH-induced increase in extra cellular fluid.39

Moreover, increased glucose and insulin concentrations, resulting from differing degrees of insulin resistance, have been recorded during rhGH therapy, in a dose-dependent manner;21,40 this is a relevant point, considering that glycaemic control is already impaired in aged subjects.

The long-term safety of increasing GH and IGF-I levels in aged people has become a concern because of reports of an association between serum IGF-I levels and cancer risk, especially of prostate, colon and breast.31,41-43 However, long-term data from children and adults with GHD treated with GH have shown no increased overall occurrence of “de novo” neoplasia or increased rate of growth of primary pituitary tumors.44 Moreover, acromegalic patients, who have extremely high levels of both GH and IGF-I for many years, do not suffer from an increased incidence of prostate or breast cancer, though they do present an increased incidence of colonic polyps.45,46 On the other hand, in acromegalic patients a GH-induced increase in serum IGF-I levels is accompanied by a parallel increase in serum IGFBP3 levels, which might have protective effects on tumoral cell proliferation,31,42 unlike in normal ageing where IGFBP3 levels are generally reduced.1

At present, no deaths or increased cancer rates directly attributable to GH use have been reported in elderly people; this may simply reflect the short-term clinical trials so far performed or the fact that this therapy is usually given toward the end of life, not allowing enough time to affect tumor development or growth.

GH-RELEASING MOLECULES AS POTENTIAL THERAPEUTIC AGENTS IN THE ELDERLY

As the reduced function of the GH/IGF-I axis in ageing mostly reflects age-related variations in the neural control of somatotroph secretion, treatment with GH-releasing molecules has been proposed in ageing. At present, two major classes of compounds have been studied for this purpose: GHRH and GH Secreatogues (GHS).

Treatment with GHRH, generally given in short-time studies as well as in a small cohorts of patients, has been shown to restore spontaneous GH secretion and IGF-I levels in the elderly47 and this effect could be enhanced by co-administration of arginine.48 Some authors also reported slight but significant positive effects on body composition,49-51 while neither increase in physical performance scores nor enhancement of the effect of exercise were demonstrated during GHRH therapy.52 Moreover, the main problem of clinical GHRH use is that it needs to be parenterally administered.

GH-Secretagogues (GHS) are synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl substances endowed with strong GH-releasing effects, active after subcutaneous, intranasal and even oral administration.53 They stimulate GH secretion by acting at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic level on GHRH-secreting neurons.53,54 Although GHS exert some stimulatory effect also on corticotroph secretion, this seems, however, an acute neuroendocrine effect, probably vanishing during prolonged treatment.54

Only a few groups have studied the clinical effects of GHS therapy in the elderly. By contrast to peptidergic GHS (e.g. GHRP-2 and Hexarelin), that showed no significant effects on either GH/ IGF-I levels or anthropometric features in elderly,55 non-peptidergic analogues (e.g. MK-677 and L-692,429) have been demonstrated as possessing powerful GH-releasing effects, restoring IGF-I secretion in older people to levels typical of young subjects.56,57 Long-term studies performed with the orally active GHS MK-677 resulted in a significant increase in IGF-I levels in elderly subjects coupled with increased lean body mass, but without any improvement in muscle strength.58 Moreover, although the combination of MK-677 and alendronate improved BMD at the femoral neck, the combination provided no additional benefit compared with alendronate alone at lumbar spine, total hip or total body.58

Overall, although GHS restore the function of the GH/IGF-I axis in elderly humans and might be important alternatives to subcutaneously administered rhGH, there is at present no clear evidence that they significantly affect the body composition or metabolic and cognitive function associated with ageing.

GH REPLACEMENT AND LONGEVITY

Although somatopause contributes to age-related changes in body composition, structure functions and metabolism that connote “frailty” in elderly subjects, information about the impact of GH and IGF-I axis on life expectancy is contradictory.

It has been clearly demonstrated in several animal models that reduced GH and IGF-I levels or actions are associated with significant increases in both average and maximal lifespan. In fact, GH resistant and GH-deficient mutant mice experienced substantially increased lifespan.59 Furthermore, a significant increase in longevity has been reported in female mice that are heterozygous KO for the gene encoding the IGF-I receptor,60 whereas transgenic mice that produce supra-physiological levels of GH for their age have markedly reduced lifespan and experience premature onset of age-related cognitive changes.61

Putative mechanisms linking reduced IGF-I levels with delayed ageing and prolonged longevity in animal models probably include reduced insulin release and/or enhanced insulin sensitivity.62 However, the link between reduced GH/IGF-I activity, improvement of insulin signaling and prolonged longevity found in animal models seems to differ from human findings, which have indicated that reduced activity of the GH/IGF-I axis (normal ageing and GHD) is associated with hyperinsulinism and insulin resistance.9,13,14 Moreover, in humans both severe GH deficiency and GH excess have been found coupled with reduced life expectancy, although these alterations could simply be the result of increased risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes or cancer rather than the acceleration of the ageing process.9,45,46

In all, there is a discrepancy between the potential role of GH and/or IGF-I in life expectancy and quality of life. It should be borne in mind that, even if GH in aged subjects is proven to have no effects or a negative influence on life expectancy, the fact that it produces objective improvements in body composition, metabolism, peripheral and central functions, well-being and quality of life makes it a very reasonable clinical objective that is almost certain to be requested by most aged individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies in adult GHD have shown that GH is more than simply a “growth hormone”, so that it should more appropriately be renamed “somatotropic hormone”. Its strong influence on body composition, metabolism and structure functions, including CNS functions, such as sleep and cognition, has amply been demonstrated by improvements in GHD patients during rhGH replacement.

Whether somatopause is simply a physiologic evolution is still a matter of debate. Although somatopause is likely to contribute to age-related clinical impairment, on the basis of available evidence, GH cannot be recommended for use by the healthy elderly, bearing in mind that GH decline with age may represent a beneficial adaptation to ageing. Conversely, the usefulness of therapy which increases GH/IGF-I levels in selected populations of “frail” elderly subjects has been suggested but not yet proven. Moreover, whenever such therapy is considered useful, the best approach would be to use molecules with a GH-releasing effect, as the pituitary GH releasable pool is fully preserved in ageing, and consequently more physiological IGF-I levels can be obtained by such intervention.

At present, no definitive answers can be provided with regard to the safety of long-term GH or GH-releasing peptide intervention in elderly individuals with the aim of reversing the effects of somatopause.

REFERENCES

1. Corpas E, Harman SM, Blackman MR, 1993 Human growth hormone and human ageing. Endocr Rev 14: 20-39.
2. Muller EE, Cella SG, Parenti M, et al, 1995 Somatotropic dysregulation in old mammals. Horm Res 43: 39-45.
3. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Gianotti L, et al, 1996 Human ageing and the GH-IGF-I axis. J Ped Endocrinol Metab 9: 271-278.
4. Arvat E, Giordano R, Gianotti L, Broglio F, Camanni F, Ghigo E, 1999 Neuroendocrinology of the human growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor I axis during ageing. Growth Horm IGF Res 9: 111-115.
5. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Gianotti L, Maccario M, Camanni F 1999 The regulation of growth hormone secretion. In: Jenkins RC, Ross RJM (eds) The endocrine response to acute illness, Front Horm Res, Basel Karger; pp, 152-175.
6. Giustina A, Veldhuis JD, 1998 Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human. Endocr Rev 19: 717-797.
7. Zadik Z, Chalew SA, McCarter RJ Jr, Meistas M, Kowarski AA, 1985 The influence of age on the 24-hour integrated concentration of growth hormone in normal individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60: 513-516.
8. Veldhuis JD, Liem AY, South S, et al, 1995 Differential impact of age, sex steroid hormones, and obesity on basal versus pulsatile growth hormone secretion in men as assessed in an ultrasensitive chemiluminescence assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 3209-3222.
9. de Boer H, Blok GJ, Van der Veen EA, 1995 Clinical aspects of growth hormone deficiency in adults. Endocr Rev 16: 63-86.
10. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, et al, 1999 Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402: 656-660.
11. van der Lely AJ, Tschop M, Heiman ML, Ghigo E, 2004 Biological, physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin. Endocr Rev 25: 426-457.
12. Arvat E, Giordano R, Broglio F, et al, 2000 GH Secretagogues in Ageing. J Anti-ageing Med 3: 149-158.
13. Toogod AA, Shalet SM, 1998 Ageing and growth hormone status. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 12: 281-296.
14. Rudman D, Feller AG, Nagraj HS, et al, 1990 Effects of human growth hormone in men over 60 years old. N Engl J Med 323: 1-6.
15. Sartorio A, Conti A, Molinari E, et al, 1996 Growth, growth hormone and cognitive functions. Horm Res 45: 23-29.
16. van Cauter E, Leproult R, Plat L, 2000 Age-related changes in slow wave sleep and REM sleep and relationship with growth hormone and cortisol levels in healthy men. JAMA 284: 861-868.
17. Aleman A, de Vries WR, de Haan EH, et al, 2000 Age-sensitive cognitive function, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 plasma levels in healthy older men. Neuropsychobiol 41: 73-78.
18. Compton DM, Bachman LD, Brand D, 2000 Age-associated changes in cognitive function in highly educated adults: emerging myths and realities. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15: 75-85.
19. van Dam PS, Aleman A, de Vries WR, et al, 2000 Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I and cognitive function in adults. Growth Horm IGF Res 10: S69-73.
20. Schneider HJ, Pagotto U, Stalla GK, 2003 Central effects of the somatotropic system. Eur J Endocrinol 149: 377-392.
21. Liu H, Bravata DM, Olkin I, et al, 2007 Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of growth hormone in the healthy elderly. Ann Intern Med 146: 104-115.
22. Holloway L, Butterfield G, Hintz RL, et al, 1994 Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on metabolic indices, body composition, and bone turnover in healthy elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 470-479.
23. Papadakis MA, Grady D, Black D, 1996 Growth hormone replacement in healthy older men improves body composition but not functional ability. Ann Intern Med 124: 708-716.
24. Johannsson G, Marin P, Lonn L, et al, 1997 Growth hormone treatment of abdominally obese men reduces abdominal fat mass, improves glucose and lipoprotein metabolism, and reduces diastolic blood pressure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 727-734.
25. Franco C, Brandberg J, Lonn L, et al, 2005 Growth hormone treatment reduces abdominal visceral fat in postmenopausal women with abdominal obesity: a 12-month placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 1466-1474.
26. Lange KH, Andersen JL, Beyer N, et al, 2002 GH administration changes myosin heavy chain isoforms in skeletal muscle but does not augment muscle strength or hypertrophy, either alone or combined with resistance exercise training in healthy elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 513-523.
27. Hameed M, Lange KH, Andersen JL, et al, 2004 The effect of recombinant human growth hormone and resistance training on IGF-I mRNA expression in the muscles of elderly men. J Physiol 555: 231-240.
28. Weissberger AJ, Anastasiadis AD, Sturgess I, et al, 2003 Recombinant human growth hormone treatment in elderly patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Clin Endocrinol 58: 99-107.
29. Johannsson G, Bengtsson BA, Ahlmen J, 1999 Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of growth hormone treatment in elderly patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis: anabolic effect and functional improvement. Am J Kidney Dis 33: 709-717.
30. Nyberg F, Burman P, 1996 Growth hormone and its receptors in the central nervous system-location and functional significance. Horm Res 45: 18-22.
31. Jones JI, Clemmons DR, 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16: 3-34.
32. Morley JE, Kaiser F, Raum WJ, 1997 Potentially predictive and manipulable blood serum correlates of ageing in the healthy human male: progressive decreases in bioavailable testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and the ratio of insulin-like growth factor 1 to growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7537-7542.
33. Kalmijn S, Janssen JA, Pols HA, et al, 2000 A prospective study on circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins, and cognitive function in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 4551-4555.
34. Papadakis MA, Grady D, Tierney MJ, et al, 1995 Insulin-like growth factor 1 and functional status in healthy older men. J Am Geriatr Soc 43: 1350-1355.
35. Paolisso G, Ammendola S, Del Buono A, 1997 Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 in healthy centenarians: relationship with plasma leptin and lipid concentrations, insulin action, and cognitive function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 2204-2209.
36. Rollero A, Murialdo G, Fonzi S, et al, 1998 Relationship between cognitive function, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I plasma levels in aged subjects. Neuropsychobiology 38: 73-79.
37. Friedlander AL, Butterfield GE, Moynihan S, 2001 One year of insulin-like growth factor I treatment does not affect bone density, body composition, or psychological measures in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 1496-1503.
38. Cummings DE, Merriam GR, 2003 Growth hormone therapy in adults. Annu Rev Med 54: 513-533.
39. Moller J, Moller N, Frandsen E, Wolthers T, Jorgensen JO, Christiansen JS, 1997 Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system prevents growth hormone-induced fluid retention in humans. Am J Physiol 272: E803-808.
40. Yuen K, Warehan N, Frystyk J, et al, 2004 Short-term low-dose growth hormone administration in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and the metabolic syndrome: effects on beta-cell function and post-load glucose tolerance. Eur J Endocrinol 151: 39-45.
41. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al, 1998 Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science 279: 563-566.
42. Shim M, Cohen P, 1999 IGFs and human cancer: implications regarding the risk of growth hormone therapy. Horm Res 51: Suppl 3: 42-51.
43. Laban C, Bustin SA, Jenkins PJ, 2003 The GH-IGF-I axis and breast cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14: 28-34.
44. Banerjee I, Clayton PE, 2007 Growth hormone treatment and cancer risk. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 36: 247-263.
45. Webb SM, Casanueva F, Wass JA, 2002 Oncological complications of excess GH in acromegaly. Pituitary 5: 21-25.
46. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G, 2004 Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25: 102-152.
47. Corpas E, Harman SM, Pineyro MA, Roberson R, Blackman MR, 1992 Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-(1-29) twice daily reverses the decreased GH and insulin-like growth factor-I levels in old men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75: 530-535.
48. Ghigo E, Ceda GP, Valcavi R, et al, 1995 Effect of 15-day treatment with growth-hormone-releasing hormone alone or combined with different doses of arginine on the reduced somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone in normal ageing. Eur J Endocrinol 132: 32-36.
49. Khorram O, Laughlin GA, Yen SS, 1997 Endocrine and metabolic effects of long-term administration of [Nle27]growth hormone-releasing hormone-(1-29)-NH2 in age-advanced men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 1472-1479.
50. Vittone J, Blackman MR, Busby-Whitehead J, et al, 1997 Effects of single nightly injections of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH 1-29) in healthy elderly men. Metabolism 46: 89-96.
51. Veldhuis JD, Patrie JT, Brill KT, et al, 2004 Contributions of gender and systemic estradiol and testosterone concentrations to maximal secretagogue drive of burst-like growth hormone secretion in healthy middle-aged and older adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 6291-6296.
52. Borst SE, 2004 Interventions for sarcopenia and muscle weakness in older people. Age Ageing 33: 548-555.
53. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Muccioli G, Camanni F, 1997 Growth Hormone-releasing peptides. Eur J Endocrinol 136: 445-460.
54. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Broglio F, et al, 1999 Endocrine and non-endocrine activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans. Horm Res 51: Suppl 3: 9-15.
55. Rahim A, O’Neill PA, Shalet SM, 1998 Growth hormone status during long-term hexarelin therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 1644-1649.
56. Chapman IM, Bach MA, Van Cauter E, et al, 1996 Stimulation of the GH / IGF-I axis by daily oral administration of a GH secretogogue (MK-677) in healthy elderly subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 4249-4257.
57. Aloi JA, Gertz BJ, Hartman ML, et al, 1994 Neuroendocrine responses to a novel growth hormone secretagogue, L-692,429, in healthy older subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 943-949.
58. Murphy MG, Weiss S, McClung M, et al, 2001 Effect of alendronate and MK-677 (a growth hormone secretagogue), individually and in combination, on markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 1116-1125
59. Bartke A, Coshigano K, Kopchick J, et al, 2001 Genes that prolong life: relationships of growth hormone and growth to ageing and life span. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56: B340-349.
60. Holzenberger M, Dupont J, Ducos B, et al, 2003 IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature 421: 182-187.
61. Bartke A, 2003 Is growth hormone deficiency a beneficial adaptation to ageing? Evidence from experimental animals. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14: 340-344.
62. Blum-Degen D, Frolich L, Hoyer S, Riederer P, 1995 Altered regulation of brain glucose metabolism as a cause of neurodegenerative disorders? J Neural Transm 46: Suppl: 139-147.

Address for correspondence:
Ezio Ghigo, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism,
Ospedale Molinette, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126 Torino, Italy,
Tel.: +39.11.6963156, Fax: +39.11.6647421,
e-mail: ezio.ghigo@unito.it

Received 03-10-07, Revised 15-11-07, Accepted 20-12-07

FEATURED ARTICLES

NEWSLETTER